LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU
Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Sender: LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Licensing language
From: LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 19:21:29 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (9 lines) 
From: Winston Tabb <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 14:00:40 +0000

The single most useful thing we could do is insist that license
language include a provision that the license terms do not supersede
provisions of the US copyright act.

Winston Tabb/Johns Hopkins

ATOM RSS1 RSS2