LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:45:30 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
From: Heather Reid <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:38:50 -0500

Hi:

We are in the process of assembling usage statistics for our online
databases for the period 2012 to present.  We are noticing a
significant drop off in apparent usage for all of our Gale databases
from 2013 to 2014.  This makes me think that perhaps the vendor
changed something about how they "count" somewhere in that time
period.  I can -- and will -- reach out to Gale about this, but also
was curious to find out if any other libraries have noticed a similar
phenomenon?

Thanks for your help,
Heather

--
Heather Reid
Dean, Library & Learning Resources
Berklee College of Music
[log in to unmask]
617-747-2603 office
978-821-1711 cell

ATOM RSS1 RSS2