From: "Williams, Ginger" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 01:01:55 +0000

I don't know that publishers care much, although that may be changing
as government agencies begin requiring that research they fund be made
available to public at no charge after a limited embargo period.

Many finders require that the funding source be acknowledged.
Acknowledging funders is also good ethical practice, as funders may
have interests that can unconsciously bias research directions and
interpretations. For example, research on tobacco use funded by
tobacco companies is likely to be carefully scrutinized due to
potential for bias.



> On Feb 19, 2017, at 6:25 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> From: Rehana Raza <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 21:51:45 +0500
>
> Can anyone explain, how important it is for publishers to collect
> funding details from authors?
>
> Rehanna
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Jim O'Donnell" <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:32:56 -0700
>
> With thanks to colleagues who pointed out that Web of Science can
> answer my question, here's a snapshot:
>
> Gates Foundation
>
> Limited to years 2015-2016, and Document type: articles
>
> Results: 3,954
>
> 2016 (1,956)
> 2015 (1,907)
>
>
> National Institutes of Health
>
> Limited to years 2015-2016, and Document type: articles
>
> Results: 133,038
>
> 2015 (67,013)
> 2016 (63,144)
>
>
> National Science Foundation
>
> Limited to years 2015-2016, and Document type: articles
>
> Results: 155,485
>
> 2015 (76,349)
> 2016 (74,863)
>
>
> Jim O'Donnell
> Arizona State University