LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 Oct 2018 22:00:41 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (3683 bytes) , text/html (8 kB)
From: Winston Tabb <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 13:38:18 +0000


So true.  This is why libraries (along with archives and museums) have been
laboring in Geneva at WIPO for more than a decade to secure an
international treaty dealing with such issues.




From: "Sowards, Steve" <[log in to unmask]>

Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:11:46 +0000

Of course, the ILL problem behind “electronic format only” is not because
of the format per se. The key problem is the fact that copyright law
exemptions for ILL have not caught up with the evolution of scholarly
publishing. The technical problems for e-book lending could be solved by
bright people, but won’t be as long as we have legislation (and
legislators, and lobbyists) standing in the way.



Steven Sowards

Associate Director for Collections

Michigan State University Libraries

366 W. Circle Drive

East Lansing MI 48824







From: Joseph Wickens <[log in to unmask]>

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 13:20:13 -0300

And the "the loss of the twenty-first century" is our inability to share
the bulk of library book collections from 2000 forward with other libraries
at all because they are being acquired in electronic format only.  This
forum addresses the most important problem facing Interlibrary Lending
today. Thanks for sharing, Jim.



Joe Wickens



On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 12:27 AM LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

From: "Jim O'Donnell" <[log in to unmask]>

Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 06:27:52 -0700

Last week, the Internet Archive's open library forum was devoted to the
practice and possibilities of controlled digital lending, a way of relying
on fair use to begin to make in-copyright library materials available to
the public digitally while respecting copyright and complying with the
law.  Three recent documents:



1.  a longer white paper on the subject:
https://osf.io/preprints/lawarxiv/7fdyr/
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__osf.io_preprints_lawarxiv_7fdyr_&d=DwMFaQ&c=nE__W8dFE-shTxStwXtp0A&r=vhHHCoQ3E9wAnrSvcCJYzw&m=prAsT-1d1AYwsvfhRgC6dX2neyPI9sZ3x_dKbnMV7Vg&s=MI6MsjDAlfTuryWeiyZLGNaEDO_q5uXYseN49oj-ITw&e=>
  Further document is included at
https://controlleddigitallending.org/readings
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__controlleddigitallending.org_readings&d=DwMFaQ&c=nE__W8dFE-shTxStwXtp0A&r=vhHHCoQ3E9wAnrSvcCJYzw&m=prAsT-1d1AYwsvfhRgC6dX2neyPI9sZ3x_dKbnMV7Vg&s=CjiZzz33G00RSCLqRDEri_Of-IwNvdc4JIkfZjHDIno&e=>



2.  a more concise 'position statement' authored by legal scholars at
Harvard, NYU, Georgetown, Duke, and the Internet Archive:
https://controlleddigitallending.org/statement
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__controlleddigitallending.org_statement&d=DwMFaQ&c=nE__W8dFE-shTxStwXtp0A&r=vhHHCoQ3E9wAnrSvcCJYzw&m=prAsT-1d1AYwsvfhRgC6dX2neyPI9sZ3x_dKbnMV7Vg&s=GSJs_93zVTTsID8NdKuju_gZ4RjAN7UIefjSImDB-Zg&e=>



3.  an even more concise blog post by Duke's scholarly communications
librarian David Hansen summarizing the issues:
https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2018/09/28/controlled-digital-lending-of-library-books/
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__blogs.library.duke.edu_scholcomm_2018_09_28_controlled-2Ddigital-2Dlending-2Dof-2Dlibrary-2Dbooks_&d=DwMFaQ&c=nE__W8dFE-shTxStwXtp0A&r=vhHHCoQ3E9wAnrSvcCJYzw&m=prAsT-1d1AYwsvfhRgC6dX2neyPI9sZ3x_dKbnMV7Vg&s=n9Qn6tgeB2QSqpRUHqrCL1Xs4G7aNWpnXh4DyA13Usc&e=>



The problem addressed is critical, what Brewster Kahle of the IA calls "the
loss of the twentieth century" -- our collective inability to access the
bulk of the material in our library collections, from the 1920s forward, in
any form other than print.



Jim O'Donnell

Arizona State University


ATOM RSS1 RSS2