LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date:
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:22:13 -0500
Reply-To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re. Open access terminology
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines) 
From: Klaus Graf <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 05:27:39 +0100

This is an very silly argument. There are also people who believe that
the mayas were astronauts.

In a scholarly context there is a clear consensus to accept the OA
definitions of Budapest, Berlin and Bethesda. And now look at the list
of institutions which have signed the Berlin declaration. I think they
are able to speak for important parts of the scholarly community.

Klaus Graf


2012/1/14 LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>:
> From: Joseph Esposito <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:25:26 -0800
>
> I just stumbled on a story on PaidContent, which I clicked on because
> the headline mentioned Open Access.  Here is the story:
>
> http://paidcontent.org/article/419-hollywood-lambasts-sky-movies-ruling-but-open-access-gains-favour
>
> Is this story about the open access to research literature?  No, it's
> about access to set-top boxes for video in the UK.
>
> People who believe that OA has an unambiguous meaning are denying the facts.
>
> Joe Esposito
>
> --
> Joseph J. Esposito
> Portable CEO
> [log in to unmask]
> @josephjesposito
> +Joseph Esposito

ATOM RSS1 RSS2