LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Tue, 27 Jun 2017 22:56:46 -0400
Reply-To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: US Court grants Elsevier millions in damages fro Sci-Hub
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
From: Thomas Krichel <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 06:42:21 +0000

LIBLICENSE writes

> I can understand how one might make a case for harm to the publisher
> (although proving it might be tricky) - but I’m struggling to think
> what the case might be for harm to customers and the public. Am I
> missing something obvious?

Erhhh ... yes. It's that other costumers will have to pay more to
compensate for the loss coming from the thieving ones.

--
Cheers,

Thomas Krichel                  http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                           skype:thomaskrichel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2