LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date:
Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:53:38 -0400
Reply-To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Still hoping someone will answer. . . (Re: "What's Changed" (Re: Update on statement against Elsevier's new "sharing" policy)
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
From: Rick Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:40:49 +0000

I would still be very interested in answers to my two questions below,
particularly from those who have been most critical of Elsevier’s new
policy.

1. As far as anyone on this list can tell, does the matrix at
http://www.slideshare.net/aliciawise/whats-changed-in-sharing-policy fully
and accurately represent what has changed with the new policy?

2. If so, it appears to me that Elsevier’s new sharing policy actually
represents a net increase in liberality when it comes to sharing and
posting ― am I mistaken about that?

---
Rick Anderson
Assoc. Dean for Scholarly Resources & Collections
Marriott Library, University of Utah
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2