LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:52:35 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (851 bytes) , text/html (1150 bytes)
From: Jean-Claude Guédon <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:29:19 -0400

**
Thank you for this URL. I listened to it and said to myself: only the
French (I was born there) can defend open access with lopsided arguments...

Two noted mistakes:

* PLoS does not practice peer review and relies on comments after
publication !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

* Gold, i.e. OA journals, really means author-pay OA journals
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Of course, in the latter case, many publishers are intent on propagating
this false conflation of Gold and author-pay as it is the business model
they use to preserve their revenue stream in the OA context.

The battle for vocabulary and words  is also part of the battle for OA.

Jean-Claude Guédon


Le lundi 15 avril 2013 à 16:50 -0400, LIBLICENSE a écrit :

to the interests of this list. --


ATOM RSS1 RSS2