LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:24:42 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1037 bytes) , text/html (2259 bytes)
From: Richard Poynder <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 06:48:18 +0000

​This year marks the 15th anniversary of the Budapest Open Access
Initiative (BOAI), the meeting that led to the launch of the open access
movement. A great deal of water has passed under the bridge since 2002, but
as 2017 draws to an end what should the stakeholders of scholarly
communication be doing now to fully realise the vision outlined at the
Budapest meeting? That is a question I have been putting to a number of
people, inviting them to say what they believe the priorities should be
going forward for the following stakeholders: researchers, research
institutions, research funders, politicians and governments, librarians and
publishers.

The response I received from Danny Kingsley, Deputy Director of Scholarly
Communication & Research Services and Head of the Office of Scholarly
Communication at Cambridge University, can be read here:
https://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/open-access-what-
should-priorities-be.html

Richard Poynder​


ATOM RSS1 RSS2