LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Message-ID:
Sender:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 3 Apr 2016 07:23:28 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
From: Ann Shumelda Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
To: LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>

See Kevin Smith's succinct commentary:

http://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2016/04/01/fgo-latest-gsuruling-odd-victory-libraries/

"Now, using the new fair use analysis directed by the Court of
Appeals, Judge Evans has handed the publishers yet another loss."

ATOM RSS1 RSS2