LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Jan 2019 00:02:59 -0500
Reply-To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ce0911057e86ad13"
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (364 bytes) , text/html (1286 bytes)
From: leo waaijers <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 19:11:00 +0100

For those who think that Elsevier, positioning itself as an information
analytics company, might be less interested in individual journals the
following article might be revealing.



https://www.scienceguide.nl/2018/12/elsevier-willing-to-compensate-editors-to-prevent-them-from-flipping/



Leo Wagers


ATOM RSS1 RSS2