LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Date:
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:28:22 -0400
Reply-To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
From: Richard Poynder <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:01:37 +0000

Last month Elsevier withdrew its support for the controversial
Research Works Act. Had it become law, the RWA would have rolled back
the NIH Public Access Policy requiring that funded researchers make
their papers freely available on the Web within 12 months of
publication. It would also have outlawed other US federal agencies
from introducing similar policies. As such, the bill was a direct
assault on Green Open Access. But while Elsevier’s retreat was a big
win for supporters of Open Access, OA will continue to be a
brick-by-brick process — as evidenced by recent events in Australia.

More here: http://poynder.blogspot.com/2012/03/open-access-brick-by-brick.html

Richard Poynder

ATOM RSS1 RSS2