LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 Apr 2024 23:29:25 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (929 bytes) , text/html (2316 bytes)
From: Sarah Maximiek <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 09:52:15 -0400

The university may not be a member of Crossref, so submitting information
at that level may not be common for them.  However, that doesn't mean they
do not understand DOI or Crossref generally.


On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:02 PM LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: Ari Belenkiy <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 23:06:03 -0700
>
> Dear members,
>
> I got into a curious situation. I recently published a paper in a journal,
> run by one of the universities in NY State, that failed to provide DOI for
> my paper.
>
> The editors were advised to submit the metadata for the paper to Crossref
> and contacted the university librarians but the latter could not help,
> being unaware of Crossref.
>
> Isn't that scandalous for an American university? How common is this
> situation in the USA?
>
> Ari Belenkiy
>
> Vancouver BC
> Canada
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2