LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 15 Jun 2019 14:27:20 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (805 bytes) , text/html (1597 bytes)
From: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:37:44 +0200

What is a no-fee journal?



Spontaneously, I would have answered: an OA journal which does not charge
publication fees. Further consideration might be needed, however, as DOAJ
and QOAM come to different conclusions with respect to a number of
journals. For example, the Elsevier journals 1873-2445 and 1873-1562 or the
Springer journals 1029-8479 and 1434-6052 do not charge authors because
libraries have paid the bill as members of the SCOAP3 project. But does
that make these journals ‘no-fee’ as DOAJ seems to conclude, or are they
just ‘discounted journals’ as QOAM claims? The outcome may have relevance
to the wider Plan S debate as well.



I would appreciate if the community could shed some light on this.



Leo Waaijers


ATOM RSS1 RSS2