From: David Prosser <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 08:35:41 +0000

2. If so, it appears to me that Elsevier’s new sharing policy actually
represents a net increase in liberality when it comes to sharing and
posting ― am I mistaken about that?

Rick, previously authors who were not subject to deposit mandates
could deposit their papers without embargo. Now they can’t.  I think
that is a significant decrease in liberality and outweighs the
increases (which in some areas was just Elsevier catching-up with
existing practice)

David


On 22 Jun 2015, at 23:53, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: Rick Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:40:49 +0000
>
> I would still be very interested in answers to my two questions below,
> particularly from those who have been most critical of Elsevier’s new
> policy.
>
> 1. As far as anyone on this list can tell, does the matrix at
> http://www.slideshare.net/aliciawise/whats-changed-in-sharing-policy fully
> and accurately represent what has changed with the new policy?
>
> 2. If so, it appears to me that Elsevier’s new sharing policy actually
> represents a net increase in liberality when it comes to sharing and
> posting ― am I mistaken about that?
>
> ---
> Rick Anderson
> Assoc. Dean for Scholarly Resources & Collections
> Marriott Library, University of Utah
> [log in to unmask]