LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Taylor & Francis Opens Access with new OA Program
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:24:09 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
From: Klaus Graf <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:05:25 +0100

2012/1/10 LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>:

> From: David Prosser <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:19:16 +0000
>
> 'Free access' and 'open access' are not synonymous terms.  If they
> were then the framers of the definitions of open access from Budapest
> onwards could have saved their time crafting definitions.  Open access
> is free access plus.  Open access is always free access, but free
> access is not always open access.
>
> What Sandy describes, free reading on screen but nothing else, may be
> valuable, but it is not open access.  It is free access.

I agree. Only libre Access (re-use allowed) is true Open Access.

Klaus Graf

ATOM RSS1 RSS2