LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
"open"?
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Jul 2019 19:06:19 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (432 bytes) , text/html (1235 bytes) 
From: "Jim O'Donnell" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 12:36:23 -0700

Pointed by the twitter feed of the estimable Joe Esposito, I read this
piece with interest:

http://www.talyarkoni.org/blog/2019/07/13/i-hate-open-science/

Too many different things lurk under the name 'open science', making the
term too conducive to ideological abuse and consequent confusion.  The
author is in the psychology department at UT Austin.

Jim O'Donnell
ASU

ATOM RSS1 RSS2