From: Viral Amin <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:22:39 -0400

Thanks for making that clear.  To confirm the trickiness of the
matter, I learned from Oxford that this is an issue of contract
interpretation, and it should be brought before legal counsel.

Viral Amin
Metadata/Electronic Resources Librarian
Library & Learning Services
Marymount University
[log in to unmask]


On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:50 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: Darlene McCoy <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:13:13 +0000
>
> Termination is one provision and a cure period is another provision.
> If there is a cure period and the cure is not completed in 30 days,
> the parties will get another 30 days for termination.  Language is
> very tricky, so drafting can modify this assumption.
>
> Darlene Evans McCoy
> Director of Digital Initiatives
> OhioLINK
> OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS
> Columbus, Ohio  43215
> [log in to unmask]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Viral Amin <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:11:49 -0400
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm new to this, so I'm eager to test my assumptions.
>
> In the license I'm currently reading through, a period of 30 days is
> granted to a Licensee or Licensor to cure a breach of contract.
> However, I am only a bit more hesitant to construe the cure period as
> the termination period, even if the condition for termination is
> either this breach, or if it is a cessation of all or part of the
> Licensed Works, in case of which a 30 notice must be given.  Would
> anyone safely assume, given these conditions for termination, that the
> termination period for both Licensee and Licensor is 30 days?
>
> --
> Viral Amin
> Metadata/Electronic Resources Librarian
> Library & Learning Services
> Marymount University
> [log in to unmask]