LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 22:18:32 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
From: Nabonita Guha <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:10:05 +0530

Dear Liblicense members,

I would like to know your opinion on perpetual access terms for
secondary databases like Web of Science, Sci-Finder, etc. As we are
aware that unlike e-journals, these databases deal with current
information along with various value additions. Getting access to the
paid but non-updated content may be like having access to half baked
information. My questions are as below:

Does it make sense to get a perpetual access for these databases?

What should be the post-cancellation terms for these kind of resources?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

With best regards

Nabonita Guha
Sr. Library-cum-Information Officer
Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced
Scientific Research,
Bangalore

(INDIA)

web:  lib.jncasr.ac.in

ATOM RSS1 RSS2