LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Mon, 12 Jun 2017 18:07:19 -0400
Reply-To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
From: Ann Shumelda Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 10:17:58 -0400

"The chemistry journal Synlett, published by Thieme, has successfully
trialled a new system of peer review that allows a crowd of 100
approved researchers to comment on manuscripts online.

"The idea was born out of frustration with traditional peer review,
says the journal’s editor in chief, Benjamin List of the Max Planck
Institute for Coal Research in Germany. ‘What we do [at the moment] is
sloppy – we let two people give their opinions and on the basis of
this a paper gets accepted or not,’ he tells Chemistry World. ‘It’s
slow and the quality can vary.’"

[SNIP]

https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/chemistry-journal-introduces-intelligent-crowd-peer-review-/3007534.article?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiT1RJNE9URmlNR1ZtWlRVMyIsInQiOiJwN2IxTDdtWXBsT2t1cXU0TW4zTlpnUFwvRWRcL2RIMFdzWXFZSEhRbk5Yc2pmTkw0MXlYcHRnTWpUeHJ6TkNwbFwvcm9pbU54YjY3VjZsWklYdVpKaXB1S2pyWjVwV1RYUXdTRzVPb1VlTndvRWdjYXZVVGVjNTZtZjdmaWNoRDRtbCJ9

ATOM RSS1 RSS2