LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:40:57 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (884 bytes) , text/html (1432 bytes)
From: Ann Shumelda Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 20:54:27 -0400

Lucy, that's quite an assortment.  Did any respondents give a sense of
why the role is placed where it is in their libraries?  Is it a
function of library size, priority assigned to the position, or?

Perhaps other readers could comment as well about the "why" of the IR
positioning?  Cheers, Ann Okerson


On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 6:35 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> From: Lusiella Fazzino <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:20:11 +0000
>
> Thank you all for the responses regarding who the IR/ Scholarly
> Communications librarians report to within their institution.
>
> These are the results:
>
> Library Director/ Dean     -3
>
> Associate Library Director/Dean     -2
>
> Scholarly Communication Dept     -1
>
> Head of Collections      -2
>
> Head of Access Services      -1
>
> Best,
>
> Lucy


ATOM RSS1 RSS2