From: SANFORD G THATCHER <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 19:18:23 -0400

As I understood the original plan for KU when Frances Pinter came up with
the
idea, institutions cooperating with the project would pony up enough money
to
cover the "first copy" costs of every KU monograph, where the variable costs
involved in producing POD versions would be paid for by the p[rices charged
for
those print copies. So not everything was free at KU.

We ran a similar OA monograph program at Penn State Press when I was
director
and we set up the Romance Studies series online in 2005. Following the
pioneering OA efforts of the National Academies Press, which had started
putting out OA monographs in the early 1990s, we at PSUP set up our system
so
as to provide some incentives for users to order POD copies and thus
produce a
revenue stream. Specifically, we only allowed for about half of every
monograph
to be downloaded while all of it could be read on screen. (NAP had taken a
different approach, allowing for complete download but only in a format that
made it look like bad newsprint.

Has KU's model changed, does anyone know?

Sandy Thatcher



On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 06:16 PM LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>From: "Brundy, Curtis T [LIB]" <[log in to unmask]>
>Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 13:50:23 +0000
>
>Does this hold for other free services? For example, most library patrons
>believe it is free to check out a physical book. Should we also begin
>charging a dollar per check out at the public library? And why stop at a
>dollar. If it is worth knowing the demand at $1, why not find out what it
>is at $5 and $10? I get it that download counts provide limited
>information. But charging for something we have intentionally invested in
>making free doesn’t seem like the right approach.
>
>Curtis
>
>*Curtis Brundy*
>Iowa State University
>*Parks Library <http://www.lib.iastate.edu/>*
>*P: 515-294-7563*
>
>
>From: JJE Esposito <[log in to unmask]>
>Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 10:06:33 -0400
>
>It is, of course, a milestone that Knowledge Unlatched (KU) reached over
>one million downloads in 2018, but does anyone know what these figures
>mean? A download is a crude metric, comparable to the page view in consumer
>Web advertising. No one in the advertising industry uses anything so
>primitive any more. It is perplexing to me that the scholarly community
>would use measures less sophisticated than those used to try to sell us a
>Pez dispenser or a trip to Las Vegas.
>
>It is an article of faith in the OA community that the high price of
>scholarly materials (invoke Elsevier's 40% margins here) deny access to
>researchers and the general public. This must be at least partly true, as
>we read all the time about monographs priced at $40 or $90 and even, last
>week, a college textbook priced at $1,000. But going from a high price to
>no price at all--OA is free to the end-user, after all--is an odd bit of
>methodology. When we measure downloads instead of sales, we move from the
>demand economy to the supply economy. This is apples and oranges.
>
>The question I have is how many downloads KU or any other OA book service
>would have if there were a charge of $1 per download, thus marrying the
>demand and supply-side economies. Would the number of downloads drop to
>900,000? 500,000? 15? We won't know until we try.
>
>It will be argued that even $1 is too much for some people. This is true.
>But where does the assumption that everyone is penniless come from? Surely
>there are some people who have downloaded books from KU who have a Netflix
>subscription, drive a Honda, and stopped off at Starbucks in the past
>month? A price of $1 download would help us find out what needs KU and
>other OA book publishers are serving and begin the hard task of measuring
>the real value these services provide.
>
>Joe Esposito
>
>
>On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 8:30 AM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>From:  [log in to unmask]
>Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 19:48:24 -0400
>
>Knowledge Unlatched titles reach over 1 million downloads in 2018
>
>More than 250% increase in use compared to 2017
>
>Berlin, 28.08.2018. Knowledge Unlatched (KU) announces a new record
>for usage of its Open Access (OA) books. Over 950 titles from the
>Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS) have been accessed more than 1
>million times by users worldwide in the past 8 months of this year
>alone. The increase in usage compared to 2017 is significant: On
>aggregate, KU content has seen 570,000 full-text downloads on the
>OAPEN platform and a further 490,000 chapter downloads on the JSTOR
>platform.
>
>"We are pleased that scientists around the world are using the content
>of our approximately 100 publishing partners to such an extent." says
>Tom Mosterd, Discovery & Account Manager at KU. "It is exciting to see
>that libraries are committed to ensuring that OA books are made
>accessible to a global audience, thereby playing a crucial role in
>reaching this key milestone.’’
>
>Financed by libraries worldwide, nearly 1,000 titles have already been
>made available through Knowledge Unlatched, and several hundred titles
>are added every year.
>
>About Knowledge Unlatched: Knowledge Unlatched (KU) offers every
>reader worldwide free access to scientific content. The online
>platform provides libraries worldwide with a central point of contact
>to support Open Access models of leading publishers and new Open
>Access initiatives.
>
>Contact:
>
>Philipp Hess, Publicity & Communications, Knowledge Unlatched
>
>[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>g