LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:39:08 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
From: "Armbruster, Chris" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:28:54 +0000

It is amazing that Elsevier continues its series of PR gaffes that
alienate authors. This is interesting particularly now that Mendeley
has been acquired.

What Elsevier should have done: Offer all Elsevier authors on
academia.edu to swap the publisher pdf for the author’s manuscript. An
easy solution.

Moreover, the deposit and availability of authors’ manuscripts is
known to increase demand for the version of record.

If I were Elsevier’s CEO I would instruct my team to come up with more
interesting ways of supporting authors’ communication efforts -
including support for archiving, for example by returning the author’s
manuscript for archiving with a DOI link to the VoR. And if I were an
Elsevier shareholder, I should get very worried if the CEO does not
have a strategy beyond take down notices for dealing with openness on
the scholarly web.

Chris

ATOM RSS1 RSS2