LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Sender:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
A social networking site is not an open access repository
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 24 Jan 2016 19:28:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
From: Subbiah Arunachalam <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 18:32:35 +0530

Our friend Muthu Madhan alerted me to this article on why
institutional repositories are far superior to social networking sites
such as Academia.edu and ResearchGate.

A social networking site is not an open access repository

https://misslibrarygrrrl.wordpress.com/2016/01/24/a-social-networking-site-is-not-an-open-access-repository/


Arun
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4398-4658
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/B-9925-2009

ATOM RSS1 RSS2