LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 11 Nov 2018 17:04:39 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1274 bytes) , text/html (2167 bytes)
From: Adam Siegel <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 19:41:53 +0000

Hi Rick,

There's nothing intrinsically illegal about a cartel.

Can you point to purchasers of "big deal" packages other than
academic/research libraries?

Adam


________________________________________

From: Rick Anderson <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 02:17:26 +0000

Adam, what cartel are you referring to? Are publishers colluding with each
other to exert illegal control over a market?

Also, what monopsony are you referring to? A monopsony is a situation in
which there’s only one buyer for a product. I can’t think of any publisher
that is in such a position.

---
Rick Anderson
Assoc. Dean for Collections & Scholarly Communication
Marriott Library, University of Utah
Desk: (801) 587-9989
Cell: (801) 721-1687
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>


From: Adam Siegel <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 00:44:34 +0000

And rather than monopoly, we should be looking at a cartel's ability to
exploit a monopsony.

Adam Siegel
Business, Economics, and Agricultural and Resource Economics Librarian
University Library
University of California, Davis
Davis  CA  95616
http://people.lib.ucdavis.edu/~apsiegel/


[SNIP]


ATOM RSS1 RSS2