LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Jun 2017 20:18:28 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1092 bytes) , text/html (1836 bytes)
From: David Prosser <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 07:20:05 +0000

Indeed.  And the lives and livelihoods of some of people who worked for the
publishers that were arbitrarily targeted by the list were affected. There
is no excuse for harassment,  but there must be an acknowledgement
that Beall’s whims had negative consequences, consequences that we
magnified by the importance we collectively gave to the list .

David

On 6 Jun 2017, at 23:58, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

From: Aline Soules <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 21:56:29 -0700

Unfortunately, some of the journals on the list weren't predatory;
yet, in some tenure cases, publications were discounted because the
journal was on the list.  If anyone picks up on this list again, I
hope the first thing the person does is check on the status of every
journal on the list.  This affects people's work lives significantly.

Aline
--
Aline Soules, Library Faculty
California State University, East Bay
25800 Carlos Bee Blvd.
Hayward, CA  94542
510-885-4596 <(510)%20885-4596>
[log in to unmask]


ATOM RSS1 RSS2