LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:15:30 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
From: Rick Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:59:46 +0000

There’s been quite a bit of discussion in my library today about this
document recently released by the Digital Public Library of America:

http://bit.ly/dpla-partnering-metadata

The sentence that is leading to lots of discussion here is this one
(from the last page):

“In addition, at this time DPLA does not collect items from
institutional repositories (such as electronic theses or
dissertations, preprints, or grey literature), or data sets.”

We’re not freaking out about it, but we do find it curious. I’d be
interested to hear others’ thoughts.

---
Rick Anderson
Assoc. Dean for Collections & Scholarly Communication
Marriott Library, University of Utah
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2