LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Date:
Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:33:38 -0400
Reply-To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Usage Consolidation and Analysis
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
From: Joanne Lustig <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:49:19 -0400

I’m trying to compare 3 tools that offer consolidation and (in some
cases) analytic capabilities for COUNTER stats:  Pubget PaperStats,
Swetswise Selection Support (ScholarlyStats), and EBSCO Usage
Consolidation.  There are as yet no published comparisons that I am
able to find, so thought I’d reach out to list to garner any
perspectives fellow members might have on any of these tools.

You can reply off-list and I’d then be happy to anonymize, aggregate,
and summarize for the list.

Thanks!

_______________________________

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­Joanne Lustig
Head of Library Services
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2