LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Message-ID:
Sender:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:05:14 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
From: Rick Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 23:49:01 +0000


>There seems to be confusion here - are we talking about cancellation
>where libraries can supply (enough of) their patrons' needs via OA
>versions of articles,

That's what I was talking about in my portion of the exchange with Harnad,
yes.

>or cancellation as 'punishment' for 'bad'
>publishers?

That seems to be what Jean-Claude is suggesting, though I'll let him speak
for himself.

For myself, I don't presume to tell libraries what their stance ought to
be regarding non-Green journals.


---
Rick Anderson
Assoc. Dean for Scholarly Resources & Collections
Marriott Library, University of Utah
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2