LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Message-ID:
Sender:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Dec 2015 19:55:39 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
From: Philip Davis <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 07:55:45 -0500

Researchers claim that PMC boosts citations by 26%. A closer look at
the paper reveals serious data and analysis problems. Can we
collectively design a better study?

http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2015/12/07/pubmed-central-boosts-citations-study-claims/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2