LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:35:40 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:10 -0500

I added this comment:

> Monograph publishing operates differently, of course. In that sector reviewers do get paid, albeit modest sums called "honoraria." In university press publishing, surpluses realized from journal publishing usually have been used to help subsidize monograph publishing, so I'm wondering why this new model doesn't allow for this cross-subsidization that has long been a tradition in university press publishing.

Sandy Thatcher


> From: Joseph Esposito <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:07:46 -0400
>
> The University of California Press is launching a new OA service with
> a different kind of business model that includes payments to editors
> and reviewers.  There is an interview with Neil Christensen of the
> Press here:
>
> http://blog.scholasticahq.com/post/100004713143/a-pay-it-forward-approach-to-open-access-publishing#.VEfx14vF8z2
>
> Joe Esposito
>
> --
> Joseph J. Esposito
> Processed Media
> [log in to unmask]
> @josephjesposito
> +Joseph Esposito

ATOM RSS1 RSS2