LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 19 Aug 2018 12:34:52 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (883 bytes) , text/html (1904 bytes)
From: "Jim O'Donnell" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 15:47:52 -0700

The concept of an embargo on one or more forms of distribution of
information is increasingly familiar, but this one appears to have a new
twist:  a publisher embargoing licensed content to libraries for a period
of time on the hypothesis that library use is cutting into sales.

]https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/
libraries/article/77775-a-dystopian-twist-for-library-e-books.html

There's no technical reason why such an embargo could not be applied to
library print book sales, but in fact libraries have been outlets for hot
new best selling fiction from date of publication for a long time.  The
same hypothesis might apply.  The alternate hypothesis, of course, is that
multiplying distribution channels increases demand rather than thinning it
out.

Jim O'Donnell
Arizona State University


ATOM RSS1 RSS2