LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Message-ID:
Sender:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 19 Jul 2016 20:12:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
From: Thomas Krichel <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 03:11:42 +0000

Rick Anderson <[log in to unmask]> writes

> My understanding is that SSRN has been a privately-owned, for-profit
> operation from the beginning.

Sure. And that was a motivation for us to continue with RePEc. Even
though the original founders were economics professors we were able
to preserve a non-commercial working papers culture in economics,
effectively blocking SSRN in their home turf.

Socarxiv looks opaque in terms of ownership. I certainly would
not promote it.

--

Cheers,

Thomas Krichel                  http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                           skype:thomaskrichel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2