LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:20:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
From: Jim O'Donnell <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:58:14 -0500

With thanks particularly to Bernie Reilly and Sandy Thatcher:
reassuring to think about CRL and LC preserving the print legacy.  Two
qualms remain:

1.  If in 2012, a reputable commercial publisher is showing this lack
of interest in print, it's not unreasonable to be concerned with the
future.

2.  Even with institutions like CRL and LC, if I understood the New
Yorker correctly, the pulping is relentless.  By the time you are
reasonably sure an issue hasn't arrived at home, you have about 7 days
left to claim it.  If the libraries are *that* efficient, then I'm
impressed, but I would hardly criticize them if their normal cycle
took a little longer -- a little too long for the publisher's
impatience.

Jim O'Donnell

ATOM RSS1 RSS2