Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 5 Dec 2017 23:36:22 -0500 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
From: Xiaotian Chen <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 21:00:50 -0600
Subscription-based A&I services Vs Google Scholar/PubMed/ERIC, that sounds
similar to the debate of subscription-based journals Vs OA journals.
"Fake news" used in the title probably hurts the white paper more than
helps, since there is no study to indicate GS/PubMed/ERIC index more fake
news, which is mostly spread on social media rather than on sites indexed
by GS/PubMed/ERIC.
---
Xiaotian Chen
Electronic Services Librarian / Associate Professor
Bradley University, Peoria, Illinois, USA. 1-309-677-2839
http://hilltop.bradley.edu/~chen/
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:14 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> From: "Benveniste,Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 15:40:13 +0000
>
> Hi there
>
> I’m new to this forum but wanted to let everyone know that the Institution
> of Engineering and Technology have recently produced a White Paper called *Cookies,
> Fake News And Single Search Boxes: The Role Of A&I Services In A Changing
> Research Landscape.*
>
> Librarians and researchers shared their thoughts with us on how they use
> search tools for academic research and highlighted the differences between
> curated resources and general search engines.
>
> You can download the White Paper for free here
> www.theiet.org/aandi-whitepaper
>
> Many thanks
>
> Steve Benveniste
>
|
|
|