LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Dec 2017 23:36:22 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1369 bytes) , text/html (3462 bytes)
From: Xiaotian Chen <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 21:00:50 -0600

Subscription-based A&I services Vs Google Scholar/PubMed/ERIC, that sounds
similar to the debate of subscription-based journals Vs OA journals.

"Fake news" used in the title probably hurts the white paper more than
helps, since there is no study to indicate GS/PubMed/ERIC index more fake
news, which is mostly spread on social media rather than on sites indexed
by GS/PubMed/ERIC.

---
Xiaotian Chen
Electronic Services Librarian / Associate Professor
Bradley University, Peoria, Illinois, USA.  1-309-677-2839
http://hilltop.bradley.edu/~chen/

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:14 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: "Benveniste,Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 15:40:13 +0000
>
> Hi there
>
> I’m new to this forum but wanted to let everyone know that the Institution
> of Engineering and Technology have recently produced a White Paper called *Cookies,
> Fake News And Single Search Boxes: The Role Of A&I Services In A Changing
> Research Landscape.*
>
> Librarians and researchers shared their thoughts with us on how they use
> search tools for academic research and highlighted the differences between
> curated resources and general search engines.
>
> You can download the White Paper for free here
> www.theiet.org/aandi-whitepaper
>
> Many thanks
>
> Steve Benveniste
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2