LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Apr 2014 19:45:22 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2211 bytes) , text/html (2598 bytes)
From: Kevin Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:26:22 +0000

Unfortunately, when you opted out of CCC licensing, all you did was decline
to receive further checks; you did not, apparently, stop them from
continuing to express their willingness to collect fees for permission when
and if they are asked.  I have heard multiple stories from both authors and
publishers about the CCC offering permission for materials that they do not
seem entitled to license.  It is quite similar, really, to the recent flap
about Elsevier offering to sell permission to reprint articles that have
been published through its own paid open access option.

The worst of this is that organizations that try to be responsible and seek
a license when they believe it is needed do not actually know whether they
are buying a valid license or just paying for something that might
ultimately be useless as protection against an infringement claim.  In that
climate of uncertainty, the value of all such licensing is diminished.

Kevin


-----Original Message-----

From: Camilla MacKay <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:21:53 -0400

An experience with the CCC and article licensing that might be of interest:

About three or four years ago, Bryn Mawr Classical Review received a check
(something under $100, as I recall) from the CCC for licensing BMCR
reviews. BMCR is open access, and moreover, authors sign no copyright
transfer agreements, so BMCR does not hold copyright in the reviews
published, and should not have been receiving a payment for licensing fees
in any case. I called the CCC to ask about the money, and was told that we
could choose to opt out of CCC licensing, so I did. I think we must have
deposited that check; there was no way to get the money to the rightful
owners because the specific reviews were not identified.

When I checked the CCC site just now, I see that it's still possible to
request a "special order" for BMCR articles. I don't know what would happen
if someone tried to license a BMCR article now, but at least we haven't
received any more checks. But there seem to be plenty of OA journals in the
CCC database with licensing options; do they all know they're represented?

Camilla MacKay
(co-editor, BMCR)


ATOM RSS1 RSS2