LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date:
Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:24:22 -0400
Reply-To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
From: Ann Shumelda Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:15:40 -0400

From a recent Elsevier newsletter:

"Based on our close review of the available evidence, there is no
clear citation advantage for open access articles, or at least not one
that can be identified as solely being related to an article’s access
status.  Whilst early studies suggested a causal relationship between
article OA status and higher citation counts, subsequent studies
identify weaknesses in the methodology used in earlier studies where a
citation advantage had been found."

https://www.elsevier.com/connect/citation-metrics-and-open-access-what-do-we-know

ATOM RSS1 RSS2