Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 12 Feb 2024 21:16:41 -0500 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
From: Ari Belenkiy <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 13:34:31 -0800
Paid reviewers, Thomas? Excellent idea.
But who are the "reviewers who write no papers themselves"? Emeriti? Not
sure one can be unbiased even if s/he sees the work that goes against their
own former writings.
In fact, your proposal reminds of the Paradox of the Barber "who
shaves only those who don't shave themselves". Such a person does not exist
after all.
Ari Belenkiy
Vancouver BC
Canada
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 1:06 PM LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> From: Thomas Krichel <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 18:26:09 +0000
>
> Rick Anderson writes
>
> > Given the hard data cited in the article, I felt like the tone of writing
> > was actually oddly calm.
>
> I agree. And beyond that, I suggest that the idea that science can be
> self-policing is on life support. We need paid reviewers, who write no
> papers, so that they are have unbiased incentives.
>
> -- Written by Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel on his
> 21434th day.
>
|
|
|