From: Craig Van Dyck <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:27:26 -0500

Dear Jean-Claude,



Just a point here about “preservation”. Most publishers (and all of the
major ones) participate in preservation archives such as CLOCKSS. Sage
preserves its journals in the CLOCKSS Archive, including *Psychological
Reports*. CLOCKSS will be adding the earlier years of *Psychological
Reports* over the coming months. Thank you.



Best regards,

Craig Van Dyck

Executive Director

CLOCKSS Archive




*From:* LibLicense-L Discussion Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
*On Behalf Of *LIBLICENSE
*Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2017 12:17 AM
*To:* [log in to unmask]
*Subject:* Re: journal archive corners-cut with no publisher change



From: "Jean-Claude Guédon" <[log in to unmask]>

Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 14:02:36 -0400

When publishers shifted from a "sale" business model to a "licensing"
business model, they also took over preservation, and access control to
back files.



This is one of the ways in which libraries have been disintermediated.
There others, such as collection development made moot by Big Deals, etc.



Jean-Claude Guédon







Le dimanche 17 septembre 2017 à 12:47 -0400, LIBLICENSE a écrit :

From: Xiaotian Chen <[log in to unmask]>

Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:28:43 -0500

Journal title: Psychological Reports (0033-2941)



Publisher: Sage



Other info: subscription not through a package, lost archives of 44 years
(1955-1998) with no notification



We all see loss of archives sometimes due to journal's ownership change or
package change, but this one is outstanding, because my library started
subscription with Sage years ago and Sage still owns it.  This journal is
not part of a package deal.  My library has 2 Sage packages (One Premier
package and one back file package), but this journal is not on the package,
but rather, is through individual title subscription.



Years ago I set up in our OpenURL link resolver that our access is from
1955 (vol 1, no 1) to present.  But today, a user reported that a request
for a 1976 article was denied.  I had a look and realized that our access
now starts from 1999. That's loss of 44 years of archive.



Should there be a movement to stop publishers from doing this?

---
Xiaotian Chen
Electronic Services Librarian / Associate Professor
Bradley University, Peoria, Illinois, USA.  1-309-677-2839
http://hilltop.bradley.edu/~chen/