LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Date:
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:17:45 -0500
Reply-To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
ASPB does not endorse RWA
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
From: Nancy Winchester <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:10:43 -0500

http://my.aspb.org/news/82355/ASPB-Does-Not-Endorse-the-Research-Works-Act-.htm
http://bit.ly/xLfjl8

The American Society of Plant Biologists (ASPB) today released a
statement  expressing its strong reservations with the Research Works
Act (RWA). In addition to articulating ASPB’s reservations with the
RWA, the statement argues that a more appropriate approach toward
broadening public access is already public law in the America COMPETES
Reauthorization Act of 2010.

Nancy Winchester
Director of Publications
American Society of Plant Biologists
Rockville, MD 20855-2768 USA
http://www.aspb.org

ATOM RSS1 RSS2