LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:14:23 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1327 bytes) , text/html (2073 bytes)
From: Richard James <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:53:34 -0500

having taken a (cautious) look at sci-hub for the first time recently-
since I try to make a rule of not visiting Russian file-sharing sites if
given a choice- I was struck by the fact that retrieved articles are
stamped with the usual retrieval information specifying the institutional
source for the pdf etc.

Which raises the question in my mind: is it possible to find out if one's
own library is being used to contribute to this mass-piracy criminal
enterprise, and if so, what should one do about it? Presuming that it's
impossible to get 'delisted' from sci-hub, what kind of protections can be
put in place to minimize risk?

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:31 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: Ann Shumelda Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:26:45 -0400
>
> Of possible interest.
>
> Academic publishing company Elsevier has filed a complaint at a New
> York District Court, hoping to shut down the Library Genesis project
> and the SciHub.org search engine. The sites, which are particularly
> popular in developing nations where access to academic works is
> relatively expensive, are accused of pirating millions of scientific
> articles.
>
>
> http://torrentfreak.com/elsevier-cracks-down-on-pirated-scientific-articles-150609/
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2