LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: The Guardian on fraud in science
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 10 Feb 2024 21:15:17 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (466 bytes) , text/html (817 bytes) 
From: Thomas Krichel <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 18:26:09 +0000

Rick Anderson writes

> Given the hard data cited in the article, I felt like the tone of writing
> was actually oddly calm.

I agree. And beyond that, I suggest that the idea that science can be
self-policing is on life support. We need paid reviewers, who write no
papers, so that they are have unbiased incentives.

--  Written by Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel on his
21434th day.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2