LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:43:49 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1133 bytes) , text/html (1493 bytes)
From: Marcus A Banks <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:43:44 +0000

Agree with Jim for the most part, but I'd say this problem for libraries is
not emerging so much as long since emerged. And to claim that all
information that's available instantly on the web is "crappy" is to
sequester ourselves ever more tightly into our beloved ivory towers.

Marcus Banks
UC Davis Blaisdell Medical Library

-----Original Message-----
From: "Jim O'Donnell" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:35:51 -0700

Amazon v. ILL:  it's a cost question and Amazon will have advantages of
scale.  Right now, in twelve cities, they're doing same day delivery on a
lot of prime items -- it will be a while before we can compete at all on
that, and meanwhile prosperous students who need this *now* for a paper
they're writing will make a choice.  (I think that is an emerging problem
for us in libraries:  they are used to getting crappy information instantly
on the net and better information
today/tomorrow/48 hours from Amazon, so when we tell them our ILL
commitment time is 2-5 days, they look at us funny and think of their
options.)

Jim O'Donnell
ASU


ATOM RSS1 RSS2