From: "Guédon Jean-Claude" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 16:55:19 +0000

The text quoted below must be parsed carefully. Are the universities
supposed to be the sole owners of scientific output? And, if they are, does
it mean that they are going to place these "assets" in the public domain?

The publishing rights are also relevant here. Are they exclusive or not?

Jean-Claude Guédon

On 2019-11-07 8:15 p.m., LIBLICENSE wrote:

From: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 09:58:05 +0100

“*… the universities remain the owner of scientific output, both articles
and data, …”*



Really? That would be a radical step forward. Finally, the results of
publicly financed research stay where they belong, in the public domain.



Leo





From: "Hersh, Gemma (ELS-LOW)" <[log in to unmask]>

Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 16:38:42 +0000

In response to the article VSNU said the following:



*We confirm that we are exploring with Elsevier about services that
contribute to increased knowledge of Dutch (open) science system. There is
joint agreement that the universities remain the owner of scientific
output, both articles and data, and of associated metadata.*



*We will always decide what third parties such as Elsevier can and cannot
do with this (meta)data. Discussions are ongoing, if there is an outcome it
will of course be made public. Until then we appreciate all responses. No
irreversible steps, options open for whatever result.*



https://twitter.com/deVSNU/status/1192083387076562944

*Ver. Universiteiten <https://twitter.com/deVSNU>*

*@deVSNU <https://twitter.com/deVSNU>*



 Gemma Hersh

SVP, Global Research Solutions

Elsevier



On 6 Nov 2019, at 12:52, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

From: <[log in to unmask]>

Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:17:38 +0100

Research data in exchange for open access, the new Elsevier policy?



https://www.scienceguide.nl/2019/11/leaked-document-on-elsevier-negotiations-sparks-controversy/



Leo Waaijers