LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 19:48:42 -0400
Reply-To: LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
From: LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (14 lines)
From: Nancy Egan <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:53:38 +0000

Hello. Are there any librarians who work in public institutions who’ve
had to have legal counsel look over (and approve) a vendor’s licensing
agreement just to run a database trial?  In one instance here, a
vendor required a signature for a trial so the lawyer had to sign.
However, now there’s been some suggestion that any vendor licenses
should be reviewed before a trial—regardless of whether a signature is
needed or not. Is this required (or has it been “suggested”) anywhere
else?

Thanks, Nancy Egan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2