From: Elena Giglia <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:56:00 +0100

I think peer review goes far over copyediting.  What about a perfectly
written work with fabricated data?  Let's have a look to Retraction
Watch to see how deep and diffuse is scientific misconduct:

http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/

This is what peer review should be about, and this is actually the "decline"

Elena

dott.ssa Elena Giglia
Responsabile Progetti Open Access
Università degli Studi di Torino
+39.011.6705923
skype: egiglia
Pubblicazioni e presentazioni in Open Access su E-LIS:
http://tinyurl.com/6gbgaj2